by Jim Rosica
A Florida appeals court has ruled that state agencies don’t have to give a specific reason when they black out an individual bit of information in a document produced under a public-records request.
Specifically, a three-judge panel of the the 1st District Court of Appeal said the state’s “Public Records Act does not require agencies to specifically identify the statutory exemption relied upon for each redaction on a redaction-by-redaction basis.”
But one of the judges separately warned that Monday’s opinion “should not foreclose a future challenge.”
The Miami Herald, which had filed a records request with the Department of Corrections, sued after the department “refused to specify the particular exemption relied upon for each redaction.”
It had sought the documents for an investigative report into abuses and deaths in the state’s prison system.
But Corrections provided only “a cover form indicating the agency’s position that the documents, as a whole, contained information that was subject to one or more of five statutory exemptions.”
Leon County Circuit Judge George Reynolds III at first said the department didn’t need to state a specific reason for every edit, then reconsidered his opinion and decided they did need to.
…Other plaintiffs may win future suits over “an agency’s method of identifying … exemptions in a public records response” if the state’s vagueness “essentially renders the mandates of Florida’s Public Records Act meaningless,” she said.
Barbara Petersen, president of The First Amendment Foundation, a Tallahassee-based open government watchdog, said in a text message, “This decision concerns me deeply and I hope the Herald decides to appeal.” [READ MORE]